ADVERTISEMENT

Denosumab Outperforms Zometa in Treating Bone Metastases

A new drug called denosumab may soon give Zometa (zoledronic acid) competition as the standard of care in treating bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients taking denosumab not only had fewer bone complications, but they took longer to develop compared with Zometa, reported researchers of a phase 3 study presented Thursday at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. 

BY MELISSA WEBER
PUBLISHED TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2009
A new drug called denosumab may soon give Zometa (zoledronic acid) competition as the standard of care in treating bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer. Patients taking denosumab not only had fewer bone complications, but they took longer to develop compared with Zometa, reported researchers of a phase 3 study presented Thursday at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

For the 2,046 patients given either denosumab or Zometa, denosumab reduced the risk of developing a single skeletal-related event (fracture, radiation, or surgery to the bone, or spinal cord compression) by 18 percent compared with Zometa. For patients who developed multiple skeletal-related events, denosumab reduced the risk by 23 percent. In total, there were 474 skeletal-related events in 30.7 percent of patients in the denosumab group versus 608 events in 36.5 percent of patients on Zometa. 

Plus, denosumab better controlled bone pain, with a median of 88 days until patients experienced moderate or severe pain, compared with 64 days with Zometa.

Both drugs were given every four weeks, and patients were encouraged to take calcium and vitamin D supplements each day. 

Side effects, such as short-term flu-like symptoms, were similar between the two arms, but Zometa caused more side effects overall. The only exception was hypocalcemia (a low level of calcium in the blood), which was more common in the denosumab group. A small percentage of patients in both arms experienced severe jaw damage, known as osteonecrosis of the jaw (2 percent with denosumab and 1.4 percent with Zometa), and kidney problems (4.9 percent and 8.5 percent, respectively). Lead study investigator Alison Stopeck, MD, of the University of Arizona Cancer Center, told reporters that these findings show that osteonecrosis of the jaw is not a class effect of bisphosphonates (like Zometa), but rather an effect of all drugs that inhibit osteoclasts, the cells that break down bone. 

Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody, is given as a subcutaneous injection and works by blocking a protein called RANK ligand, which tells the body to remove bone. Zometa, an intravenous bisphosphonate, uses a slightly different strategy—it attaches directly to the surface of bone to halt bone breakdown. 

Amgen, the maker of denosumab, plans to file the drug for approval in the first quarter of next year for the treatment of bone metastases, said Lisa Rooney, a spokesperson for the company. In addition to the study presented at the meeting, research demonstrating denosumab’s effectiveness in prostate cancer and other solid tumors will be part of the approval application, she said. 

This article is a part of CURE’s 2009 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium coverage. To read more articles from SABCS 2009, visit sabcs2009.curetoday.com.













ADVERTISEMENT
Related Articles
Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Tamoxifen as Chemoprevention in High-Risk Women
BY CHRISTINA IZZO
A new study has found that while the breast cancer prevention drug tamoxifen’s benefits outweigh its risks, the drug isn’t right for all women.
Success Fuels Researcher's Dreams of Helping Patients With Breast Cancer
Every day, breast cancer researcher Edith Perez sets her mind on finding better treatments for the disease and conducting research aimed at improving patients' lives.
Hope vs. Acceptance: The Metastatic Cancer See-Saw
Those of us living with metastatic cancer ride a see-saw between hope and acceptance.
Ovarian Suppression Emerges as Option for Younger, Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients
BY JASON M. BRODERICK
Women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who remained premenopausal after receiving chemotherapy had a lower risk of disease recurrence when adding ovarian suppression to adjuvant Aromasin, according to results from the phase 3 SOFT trial.
Several Cancer Therapies Up for FDA Review in 2015
BY ANITA T. SHAFFER
The Food and Drug Administration’s calendar for making decisions on new cancer drugs and indications is taking shape for 2015, and the clock is ticking on at least 13 applications for novel agents and new therapeutic settings for existing drugs.
Related Videos
Breast Oncologist Beth Overmoyer Explains Results of Ovarian Suppression
Beth Overmoyer, a breast oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, speaks on the results of the SOFT trial and its potential impact on young women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
SABCS: Debu Tripathy Discusses Hormonal Therapy Advances in Breast Cancer
Debu Tripathy reports on recent studies involving hormone therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Follow Up Study Data Draws Attention to Benefit, Side Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Debu Tripathy,editor-in-chief of CURE magazine, explains the importance of chemotherapy studies presented at the 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, including new data on the impact of side effects.
Recent Publications
  • photo
    photo
    photo
    photo
    photo
  • photo
    photo
    photo
    photo
    photo
ADVERTISEMENT
$auto_registration$