Primary CNS Lymphoma Treatment (PDQ®)
General Information About Primary CNS Lymphoma
Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is defined as lymphoma limited to the cranial-spinal axis without systemic disease. An increasing incidence of this disease has been seen among patients with AIDS and among other immunocompromised persons. The natural history of this disorder differs between patients with AIDS and those without AIDS. Computed tomographic (CT) scans may show ring enhancement in 50% of AIDS patients while patients without AIDS almost always show only homogeneous enhancement.
Both groups do equally poorly without therapy (1â€“3 month mean
survival), but the overall survival for treated patients is much better for
patients without AIDS (18.9 months) than for those with AIDS (2.6 months).
Other PDQ summaries containing information related to primary CNS lymphoma include:
Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment
Treatment Option Overview for Primary CNS Lymphoma
Because of the diffuse nature of central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas, aggressive surgical decompression with partial or gross total removal of the tumor is of no benefit to the patient. Median survival with surgery alone is in the range of only 1 to 5 months. Until the mid-1990s, radiation therapy had been the standard treatment, with doses of up to 45 Gy using standard fractionation. A prospective trial by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (
RTOG-8315) used 40 Gy whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and a 20 Gy boost to
the tumor and found that the results were no better than had been previously reported with
a median survival of 1 year and 28% of the patients surviving 2 years. Disease recurs in
the brain in 92% of patients despite high doses of radiation. The addition
of spinal-axis radiation does not affect survival because it does not prevent
Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy
Two multicenter, prospective trials (including
RTOG-8806) used preirradiation cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone followed by WBRT. Median survival times were no better than for radiation
therapy alone. The failure of these and other combined modality trials
has been attributed to poor penetration of standard drugs through the blood-brain barrier and to increased neurologic toxic effects. A retrospective review
of 226 patients suggested improved results with the use of high-dose methotrexate or
cytarabine with radiation therapy rather than with other combination regimens.
A multicenter trial (
RTOG-9310) of 102 patients used high-dose methotrexate (2.5 g/m 2) for five cycles, intravenous vincristine, oral procarbazine, intraventricular methotrexate, and either 45 Gy of WBRT or 36 Gy in a hyperfractionated schedule. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 24 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 37 months. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiA] Severe delayed neurologic toxic effects were seen in 15% of patients.
Another multicenter trial (
EORTC-20962 [NCT00003061]) was comprised of 52 patients younger than 66 years who used high-dose methotrexate, teniposide, carmustine, methylprednisolone, intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine, and hydrocortisone followed by 40 Gy of radiation therapy; the median survival was 46 months, but a 10% toxic death rate occurred even in this younger patient population. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiA] Follow-up was too short (median 27 months) to fully assess severe delayed neurologic toxic effects.
Because of unsatisfactory results of WBRT alone and the neurologic toxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, a major focus is now on trials with chemotherapy alone.
Multiple reports have described systemic chemotherapy, which has been employed alone or
with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption, usually including high-dose methotrexate with frequent
A multicenter trial (
NABTT-9607) evaluated high-dose methotrexate alone (8 g/m 2) for newly diagnosed patients, with WBRT administered only at disease recurrence. With a median follow-up of 2 years, median PFS was 13 months and median OS had not been reached at 23 plus months. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiA] Another multicenter trial ( EORTC-26952) of 50 patients older than 60 years used high-dose methotrexate (3 g/m 2/cycle), lomustine, procarbazine, methylprednisolone, and intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine. The 1-year PFS was 40%, and the median OS was 14.3 months in this older patient group with a median age of 72 years. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiA] Another multicenter trial of 65 patients used both high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine, including ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, vinca alkaloids, dexamethasone, and intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine, and prednisolone. The median time-to-treatment failure was 15 months with a median survival of 34 months; 57% of patients age 60 or younger were still alive at a median follow-up of 8 years. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiA]
Patients with recurrent or refractory CNS lymphoma after methotrexate-based chemotherapy are candidates for salvage chemotherapy.
Severe delayed neurologic toxic effects were rarely seen in these chemotherapy-only trials (in the absence of subsequent radiation therapy). Reduction of dosage for subsequent radiation to 23.4 Gy has been applied for patients who achieve clinical complete response after induction chemotherapy.
[ Level of evidence: 3iiiDiii]
Many of the aforementioned phase II results have never been tested in a randomized setting because of an insufficient number of patients.
Chemotherapy and Stem Cell Transplant
Intensive chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation is also under evaluation; neurologic toxic effects were not reported in the absence of radiation therapy.
A phase II feasibility study used chemotherapy induction with methotrexate, temozolomide, and rituximab (given once every 2 weeks for 10 doses) plus consolidation with etoposide and high-dose cytarabine; with a median follow-up of 4.9 years, this phase II Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial of 44 patients reported a complete radiographic response in 66% of the patients, a 2-year PFS of 57%, and an estimated OS of 65% at 4 years. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiDiv] A randomized, prospective trial by the CALGB ( CALGB-50202 [NCT00098774]) will compare this nonstandard induction regimen versus the same induction chemotherapy with myeloablative peripheral stem cell transplantation.
These phase II results have never been tested in a randomized setting because of an insufficient number of patients.
Severe cognitive deficits are reported with all intensive therapies due to iatrogenic leukoencephalopathy. Retrospective data suggest a decreased risk of dementia when chemotherapy is employed prior to radiation therapy and even less when radiation therapy is avoided.
The use of systemic chemotherapy
alone, with or without osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption, may avoid the
cognitive loss observed with radiation therapy. Comparative trials
with validated measures of cognitive function will be necessary to determine
the value of delaying radiation therapy until relapse after high-dose
chemotherapy. Glucocorticoids can also produce substantial but
short-lived remissions. Steroid efficacy may complicate the diagnostic
evaluation by obscuring the histologic findings. Other drugs that cross the
blood-brain barrier are under clinical evaluation.
In a prospective, randomized trial of 551 immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma, all patients received induction chemotherapy with six cycles of high-dose methotrexate (4 g/m
2) with or without ifosfamide. Upon completion of chemotherapy, responders were randomly assigned to WBRT (45 Gy) or to no treatment for complete response patients and cytarabine for partial response patients. There was no statistical difference in median OS with 32.4 months for patients receiving radiation therapy versus 37.1 months for those not receiving radiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80â€“1.40, P = .71). [ Level of evidence: 1iiA] Treatment-related neurotoxic effects were significantly worse on the radiation therapy arm, and such toxicity must be weighed against the possibility that the survival from chemotherapy alone may be marginally inferior to the survival when radiation is added.
In a randomized, nonblinded, multicenter trial, 79 patients were randomly assigned to high-dose methotrexate versus high-dose methotrexate plus cytarabine.
While 3-year PFS was better for the 2-drug regimen (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31â€“0.92, P = .01), there was no difference in 3-year OS (46% for the 2-drug regimen vs. 32% for the 1-drug regimen, HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.38â€“1.13; P = .07). [ Level of evidence: 1iiDiii]
HIV-Associated Primary CNS Lymphoma
Patients with HIV-associated primary CNS lymphoma usually have very advanced infections with CD4 counts less than 50 cells/mm
3. Consequently, most patients die of opportunistic
infections regardless of therapy for the lymphoma. Groups that benefit most
from radiation therapy, with or without antecedent chemotherapy, include those
HIV-seropositive patients with no previous opportunistic infections or tumors for
whom the CNS lymphoma is the AIDS-defining illness, and those patients with a
good performance status, high CD4 lymphocyte count (>100mm 3), and symptoms
referable only to the CNS lymphoma. Treatment of these patients requires
special consideration. (Refer to the PDQ summary on AIDS-Related Lymphoma
Treatment for more information.)
An international consortium performed a retrospective review of 83 HIV-negative patients with primary intraocular lymphoma.
In selected patients with no evidence of disseminated CNS disease, localized therapy with intraocular methotrexate or ocular radiation therapy is associated with equivalent outcomes seen with systemic chemotherapy and/or WBRT. Localized therapy with intraocular methotrexate or ocular radiation therapy did not affect relapse rate, median PFS, or median OS compared with systemic chemotherapy and WBRT. [ Level of evidence: 3iiiDiv]
Current Clinical Trials
Check for U.S. clinical trials from NCI's list of cancer clinical trials that are now accepting patients with
primary central nervous system non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The list of clinical trials can be further narrowed by location, drug, intervention, and other criteria.
General information about clinical trials is also available from the
NCI Web site.
Changes to This Summary (12/04/2014)
The PDQ cancer information summaries are reviewed regularly and updated as new information becomes available. This section describes the latest changes made to this summary as of the date above.
Editorial changes were made to this summary.
This summary is written and maintained by the
PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, which is
editorially independent of NCI. The summary reflects an independent review of
the literature and does not represent a policy statement of NCI or NIH. More
information about summary policies and the role of the PDQ Editorial Boards in
maintaining the PDQ summaries can be found on the About This PDQ Summary and PDQ NCI's Comprehensive Cancer Database pages.
About This PDQ Summary
Purpose of This Summary
This PDQ cancer information summary for health professionals provides comprehensive, peer-reviewed, evidence-based information about the treatment of primary CNS lymphoma. It is intended as a resource to inform and assist clinicians who care for cancer patients. It does not provide formal guidelines or recommendations for making health care decisions.
Reviewers and Updates
This summary is reviewed regularly and updated as necessary by the
PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board, which is editorially independent of the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The summary reflects an independent review of the literature and does not represent a policy statement of NCI or the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Board members review recently published articles each month to determine whether an article should:
- be discussed at a meeting,
- be cited with text, or
- replace or update an existing article that is already cited.
Changes to the summaries are made through a consensus process in which Board members evaluate the strength of the evidence in the published articles and determine how the article should be included in the summary.
The lead reviewers for Primary CNS Lymphoma Treatment are:
- Andrew S Chi, MD, PhD (Massachusetts General Hospital)
- Mark J. Levis, MD, PhD (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins)
- Eric J. Seifter, MD (Johns Hopkins University)
Any comments or questions about the summary content should be submitted to Cancer.gov through the Web site's
Contact Form. Do not contact the individual Board Members with questions or comments about the summaries. Board members will not respond to individual inquiries.
Levels of Evidence
Some of the reference citations in this summary are accompanied by a level-of-evidence designation. These designations are intended to help readers assess the strength of the evidence supporting the use of specific interventions or approaches. The PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial Board uses a
formal evidence ranking system in developing its level-of-evidence designations.
Permission to Use This Summary
PDQ is a registered trademark. Although the content of PDQ documents can be used freely as text, it cannot be identified as an NCI PDQ cancer information summary unless it is presented in its entirety and is regularly updated. However, an author would be permitted to write a sentence such as â€œNCIâ€™s PDQ cancer information summary about breast cancer prevention states the risks succinctly: [include excerpt from the summary].â€
The preferred citation for this PDQ summary is:
National Cancer Institute: PDQÂ® Primary CNS Lymphoma Treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Date last modified <MM/DD/YYYY>. Available at:
http://cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/primary-CNS-lymphoma/HealthProfessional. Accessed <MM/DD/YYYY>.
Images in this summary are used with permission of the author(s), artist, and/or publisher for use within the PDQ summaries only. Permission to use images outside the context of PDQ information must be obtained from the owner(s) and cannot be granted by the National Cancer Institute. Information about using the illustrations in this summary, along with many other cancer-related images, is available in
Visuals Online, a collection of over 2,000 scientific images.
Based on the strength of the available evidence, treatment options may be described as either â€œstandardâ€ or â€œunder clinical evaluation.â€ These classifications should not be used as a basis for insurance reimbursement determinations. More information on insurance coverage is available on Cancer.gov on the
Coping with Cancer: Financial, Insurance, and Legal Information page.
More information about contacting us or receiving help with the Cancer.gov Web site can be found on our
Contact Us for Help page. Questions can also be submitted to Cancer.gov through the Web siteâ€™s Contact Form.
Get More Information From NCI
For more information, U.S. residents may call the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Cancer Information Service toll-free at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237) Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., Eastern Time. A trained Cancer Information Specialist is available to answer your questions.
NCI's LiveHelpÂ® online chat service provides Internet users with the ability to chat online with an Information Specialist. The service is available from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday. Information Specialists can help Internet users find information on NCI Web sites and answer questions about cancer.
For more information from the NCI, please write to this address:
- NCI Public Inquiries Office
- 9609 Medical Center Dr.
- Room 2E532 MSC 9760
- Bethesda, MD 20892-9760
NCI Web site provides online access to information on cancer, clinical trials, and other Web sites and organizations that offer support and resources for cancer patients and their families. For a quick search, use the search box in the upper right corner of each Web page. The results for a wide range of search terms will include a list of "Best Bets," editorially chosen Web pages that are most closely related to the search term entered.
There are also many other places to get materials and information about cancer treatment and services. Hospitals in your area may have information about local and regional agencies that have information on finances, getting to and from treatment, receiving care at home, and dealing with problems related to cancer treatment.
The NCI has booklets and other materials for patients, health professionals, and the public. These publications discuss types of cancer, methods of cancer treatment, coping with cancer, and clinical trials. Some publications provide information on tests for cancer, cancer causes and prevention, cancer statistics, and NCI research activities. NCI materials on these and other topics may be ordered online or printed directly from the
NCI Publications Locator. These materials can also be ordered by telephone from the Cancer Information Service toll-free at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237).