Adding the chemotherapy Temodar (temozolomide) to short-course radiotherapy after surgery in elderly patients with glioblastoma boosted overall survival (OS) by nearly two months, bringing one-year survival rates up from 22.2 percent to 37.8 percent, according to study results announced during the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a gathering of over 30,000 oncology professionals in Chicago.
The addition of oral Temodar was even more effective, boosting survival by about six months, in patients with MGMT promoter methylation, a genetic abnormality associated with a better response to chemotherapy and longer survival with glioblastoma.
The trial demonstrated not only that Temodar sparks a statistically significant improvement in OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in this setting, but that older patients can tolerate the combination regimen — relevant in a disease in which the average patient’s age of diagnosis is 64 years.
Temodar was approved for the treatment of glioblastoma in 2015 after it was tested in adults aged 18 to 71 in combination with radiotherapy; meanwhile, clinical trials have shown that short-course bests longer-course radiotherapy in older adults. But until this international, randomized phase 3 trial, combined short-course radiotherapy and Temodar had not been tested specifically in older adults with the disease.
“Although glioblastoma disproportionately affects older patients, there are no clear guidelines for treating these patients, and practice varies globally,” said lead study co-author and medical doctor James R. Perry, the Crolla Family Endowed Chair in Brain Tumour Research at the Odette Cancer and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centres in Toronto, Canada. “This study provides the first evidence from a randomized clinical trial that chemotherapy in combination with a shorter radiation schedule significantly extends survival without a detriment to quality of life.”
The trial included 562 patients aged 65 years or older who were newly diagnosed with glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults and the leading cause of cancer death in people aged 40 to 60 years. The median age of the patients was 73 years, and two-thirds were older than 70 years.
All patients were given hypofractionated (short-course) radiation at 40 Gy in 15 fractions over three weeks, and half the patients were also administered concurrent Temodar, followed by monthly Temodar until disease progression or for a maximum of 12 cycles.
All patients on the experimental arm of the trial experienced a boost in survival, with a median OS of 9.3 months in the combination arm versus 7.6 months in the radiotherapy-alone group. Tumor growth was slower in the combination cohort, with median PFS logged at 3.9 months in the radiotherapy-only group and 5.3 months in the combination group.
The one-year and two-year survival rates were 37.8 percent and 10.4 percent, respectively, with the combination; for those in the radiotherapy group, one-year and two-year survival rates were 22.2 percent and 2.8 percent.
Among 165 patients with MGMT promoter methylation, median OS was 7.7 months in the radiotherapy-only group and 13.5 months in the Temodar plus radiotherapy group. In 189 MGMT unmethylated patients, OS was 10 months with the combination regimen and 7.9 months with radiotherapy alone. Due to a lack of available tissue, the methylation status of some patients in the trial was not tested.
“Although the difference in median survival seems modest, [Temodar] significantly increased the chances of surviving two or three years. For an individual patient, that can mean being able to be part of another family holiday or celebration,” Perry said.
Patients who took Temodar along with radiotherapy experienced more nausea, vomiting and constipation during the first week of combined treatment than patients in the radiotherapy-alone group and a slight increase (less than 5 percent) in serious or severe hematological toxicities, but patient-reported quality-of-life assessments on questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and BN20 indicated no differences in physical, cognitive, emotional, or social functioning between the two groups. A total of 97 percent of patients in the combination arm were able to complete their three weeks of chemoradiation.
“Glioblastoma is frequently diagnosed in older individuals, and these are important data showing that our best therapies can work and be tolerable for elderly patients,” said Brian Alexander, an ASCO expert in brain cancers. “It’s good to have an option to offer patients that we know can have a positive impact — though, still, physicians and their patients need to weigh the benefits of this approach carefully.”
The trial was run by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group with collaboration from the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Trans-Tasmin Radiation Oncology Group.
I live in the Uk and was diagnosed quickly in March with a grade IV glioblastoma. I ad what appears to be the best combination for older patients, good resection , said to be 95% , of the tumour, 6 weeks of radiotherapy and Temodar and just finished that. Discussion with my Consultant, after reading about methylated/ unmethylated led me to find out which I am in, although not previously discussed with me. I am in the good side but was told I only have 25% methylated and my oncologist would have hoped for me, with best results of 50% upwards. In all the discussion from here and ASCO I thought you either were or not methylated, with no mention of percentages within that. Can anyone throw any light on this issue? Thanks
Wow I am so glad I found this . I have pretty much spent February 2018 floundering on the 28th I had the day off work with nasty headache which I usually never suffer from this completely incapacitated me I had the day off work which I hated doing and went to the Drs; we had just moved into our new home after moving over 4 years ago from Adelaide South Australia to WA.. the dr was new to me and didn
I am a believer that all disease like cancer can be cured with wave technology. If some cancer is cured by chemo and radiology then my theory is correct that different wave lengths or frequencies of radiation will kill any target disease or tumor that is targeted with wave energy. I will explain because I just want people to be cured. During world war 2 we used a angle shaped --say octagon for example---rotating shield to photograph an actual explosion of a nuke in slow motion. The angled or multisided rotating shield ---when spun at different speeds in front of camera lens which would take photos in milliseconds. Well my theory is if you use gamma radiation---pinpointed at say a tumor and spin a shield with beam going through low spots on lead shield---this will change frequencies of the beam with different speeds of rotating shield to high or low frequencies . Everything living lives on frequencies or can be killed with different frequencies of radiation. My guess is instead of names for pathogens or viruses--bacteria we will call disease by its number representing its frequency number----the number of speed of rotation of shield --6 sided shield times 100 revolution a second equals 600 for a frequency number. If theory is correct---you can through away all medications. walk through scanner and walk out office cured. It will kill tumors and so on without surgery or meds and regular cells should not be damaged. one in hundred may alter genetics of growing younger people. Now--someone get busy! Actually some older people may regain youth and live longer as long as 130 years because some wave energy will causes life energy to reinvent the cell to reverse some aging. I was a biological wiz in school and slept in adv. biology class--only one ever to get an A in mr morris class --I got 4 --A s
Page 1 of 1 1
You must log in to use this feature, please click here to login.