ADVERTISEMENT

The Genes That Bind

Parents decide if and when to share genetic risk with a child.

BY CHARLOTTE HUFF
PUBLISHED MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2010
For Sara Reveles-Pellegrini, one of four sisters, the fingerprint of cancer has left its imprint on her family tree and her memories, long before she learned of a gene called BRCA.

In the late 1990s, the family rallied around Pellegrini’s two older sisters, Rebecca and Rachel, both diagnosed with breast cancer within a year of each other. By Pellegrini’s wedding in 2000, Rebecca was quite ill, and within a few months of death. Rachel continued to battle the malignancy for years.

So Pellegrini had already developed a plan before she underwent testing in 2005 for the BRCA mutation, a gene alteration that increases a woman’s risk of breast and ovarian cancers. “Seeing how aggressive the cancer was with my sisters, I knew that I wanted to remove body parts.” She was 40 years old with a house filled with children, two boys and two girls, ages 4 and younger. Two of the toddlers played on the floor while the genetic counselor explained her results: positive for a BRCA1 mutation.

For the next three years, Pellegrini underwent some 30 surgeries, including the removal of her uterus, ovaries, fallopian tubes, and both breasts. Infection and breast reconstruction complications sent her back to the operating room again and again. Through it all, Pellegrini and her husband talked to their children about her proactive surgical decisions and the family’s history of breast cancer, which also took Rachel’s life in 2007. 

Even so, Pellegrini was startled one morning last year, as she curled her older daughter’s hair for a school play, when 8-year-old Antonia asked about testing for breast cancer. (She had seen a TV commercial about genetic testing.) Could she get tested as a teenager? “I was surprised and amazed and almost a little heartbroken,” Pellegrini says.

A few recent studies indicate that today’s parents err on the side of disclosure. According to data presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting last spring, 63 percent of mothers shared their BRCA results with their children—ages 8 to 21—within a month of learning them. “Families and kids are more exposed to genetics, now more than ever,” says Beth Peshkin, CGC, a study co-author and senior genetic counselor at Georgetown University’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center in Washington, D.C.

Another recent study, focused on mutations associated with a hereditary colorectal cancer condition called Lynch syndrome, sometimes referred to as hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), also identified a high rate of disclosure. Nearly all—98 percent of participants—told at least one first-degree relative, according to the 2008 study in the journal Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. Nearly 90 percent of those with children shared their results; most of the remaining participants planned to once their children were older.

Genetic counselors advise parents to weigh not only their child’s age and relative maturity in discussing familial genetic patterns but also the immediate relevance for that child. For example, if the parent’s genetic mutation is linked to Lynch syndrome, parents have a lot more leeway since colonoscopy screening is not typically recommended until early adulthood, says Amie Blanco, CGC, a genetic counselor at the Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention Program at University of California, San Francisco.

Traditionally it’s been thought that children couldn’t do much, at least on a practical level, with knowledge of their family’s genetic risk, says Angela Bradbury, MD, director of breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment at the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia. So she was intrigued when a study she led, published in 2009 in the journal Psycho-Oncology, identified some lifestyle changes among 22 young adults after learning of their parents’ BRCA mutation.

Five of the seven young adults who had reported smoking said they decided to quit. “That was impressive to us,” Bradbury says.

Bradbury, who is now interviewing teenagers ages 11 to 19 for another study, describes that age group as relatively mature and savvy. Already, they’ve developed a good “working knowledge” of genetics, she says.

When sitting down with a child, genetic counselors recommend striving to frame the news in a positive light. Don’t focus disproportionately on the genetic risk, they say. Instead, describe how the knowledge can be used proactively, along with screening and medical advances, to protect the child once he or she is older. Also, healthy lifestyles that would be adopted regardless of genetic risk can be emphasized without relating it to genetic risk.

As anyone with children knows, sometimes questions can pop up unexpectedly, says Peshkin. “You don’t always have to give the comprehensive answer,” she says. “You can answer the question that the child has without going into more than he or she wants to know necessarily.”

The parent can then circle back and revisit the subject later, either soon after or with the passing years, she says. There likely will be various opportunities, such as a news story about genetics or a family history project for school, Peshkin says. Also, keep in mind that children may process their potential genetic risk differently as they mature.

ADVERTISEMENT
Related Articles
Medicare to Cover Lung Cancer Screening
BY ELIZABETH WHITTINGTON
With the agency’s proposal to cover lung cancer screening, focus turns to implementation and increasing cures.
Avoid Carcinogens, Not the Grill This Summer
BY SONYA COLLINS
Cooking on the grill can add carcinogens to your meal. Here's how to avoid them.
Accuracy Matters When It Comes to Diagnosing Cancer
BY AIMEE SWARTZ
Biomarkers can estimate cancer risk, screen for the disease and confirm a diagnosis.
No Link Between Fertility Treatment and Overall Risk of Childhood Cancer
BY KATHERINE LAGOMARSINO
An analysis of several studies found the risk of cancer in children born through IVF is low.
ADVERTISEMENT
$auto_registration$