Coordinating Care After Cancer

For cancer survivors, health care is anything but routine.

DAWN DORSEY
PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2011
Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the General Discussions CURE discussion group.
Peter Noble is eager to close the book on cancer, or at least get it down to a novella, and move on. Noble, 57, learned in November 2009 that he had cancer of the tonsils that was staged between 2 and 3. Thirty-five radiation treatments and three rounds of chemotherapy meant he had to use a stomach tube for six months.

Noble's treatment ended in March 2010, and for a year he saw his internist, his head and neck surgeon, his medical oncologist and his radiation oncologist every three months. Each of them had a slightly different approach to Noble’s follow-up care. In May 2011, he stopped seeing his radiation oncologist. 

“They were duplicating follow-up, and he seemed the best one to drop,” Noble says. 

When he asked his head and neck surgeon about seeing only one specialist, the doctor offered to send a letter to the medical and radiation oncologists and work it out. His last visit was spent between the two offices trying to determine which scan was needed. Then, when he decided to stop seeing one oncologist and be followed by the head and neck surgeon, he received a registered letter from the oncologist asking him to come in.

“It’s confusing, costly and possibly unnecessary,” he says. “I’m grateful for this team; they saved my life. But I’m looking forward to the day, which my doctors say may be in four or five years, when I can transfer all my care to my internist.”

The concept of long-term cancer survival is relatively new, and even professionals concede there is no consensus on what care should look like or who should provide it. In 2005, the Institute of Medicine issued From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition, a comprehensive look at the needs of survivors, which listed four components of quality cancer survivorship care: 

> Prevention of recurrent and new cancers, and of other late effects;

> Surveillance for cancer spread, recurrence or second cancers; assessment of medical and psychosocial late effects;

> Intervention to help with effects of cancer and its treatment; and

> Coordination between specialists and primary care providers to ensure that all of the survivor’s health needs are met.

As most healthcare professionals know, these are ambitious goals, and a nationwide survey of medical oncologists and PCPs concerning cancer survivorship care released at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting in Chicago has shed some light on a few of the challenges to achieving them. 

Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and the American Cancer Society, the survey found that those PCPs who were following breast and colon cancer survivors for five or more years after their initial cancer treatment were more likely than oncologists to order tests or treatments as malpractice protection. The PCPs also reported being concerned about their lack of training to manage patient problems. 

Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the General Discussions CURE discussion group.
x-button
 
CURE wants to hear from you! We are inviting you to Share Your Story with the readers of CURE. Submit your personal experience with cancer by visiting Share Your Story
 
Not yet receiving CURE in your mailbox? Sign up to receive CURE Magazine by visiting GetCureNow.com
$auto_registration$