Future Frontier: Fighting Cancer at the Genetic Level

The evolution of cancer genomics and what it means to you.

Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the General Discussions CURE discussion group.
Rita Doerner was stunned earlier this year when doctors told her she had stage 2 breast cancer. The 77-year-old from St. Louis did not have any symptoms. Although her sister died from ovarian cancer, Doerner did not think she had any particular risk. She figured genetics were on her side. “When they told me I had cancer, I didn’t believe it,” she says. In addition to standard hormone therapy, Doerner has tried a new investigational drug—one that is not specifically geared to treat breast cancer. Rather, it targets cancers with a mutation in a gene called PIK3CA—which Doerner has. Because the mutation developed in her tumor and was not inherited or present in her normal cells, it created an opportunity to intervene with a treatment that is quite specific.

The human genome is the instruction manual for assembling all the molecules that keep cells alive. It’s a biochemical code, and sometimes the coding ends up with its own bad autocorrect. Often these glitches don’t matter, but sometimes, like writing “one” when you mean “none,” a slight change makes a big difference.

A malformed molecule comes off the factory line, and like paper airplanes, the proteins of life won’t work if they’re not folded just right. When a cell collects too many misshapen molecules from bad instructions, the normal checks and balances on growth can go offline. These errors manifest in two main ways. In one instance, certain genes, called oncogenes, get switched on and can lead to cancer growth. In another situation, genes, called tumor suppressor genes, are switched off. Either way, these errors can be inherited or develop in the body over time. This is why cancer is ultimately a genetic disease, and why, in Doerner’s case, genetics were not on her side.

Researchers have long searched for genetic errors responsible for corrupting a normal cell and sending it down the path to a runaway tumor. But until recently, the hunt for cancer-causing genes was a slow, tedious and expensive process. Obtaining the sequence of a gene (reading its code) had to be done by hand, sifting through DNA bit by bit. When researchers embarked on the U.S. Human Genome Project in 1990, the job of sequencing all human genes took more than a decade to complete and cost almost $3 billion. Some of the first cancer sequencing efforts cost more than $100,000 per tumor.

But just as your car now has more computing power than an Apollo spaceship, so has genetic sequencing become more compact, affordable and nimble than scientists once thought possible. The most modern method of gene sequencing—called next-generation sequencing—analyzes genes so rapidly that scientists almost have the love-struck awe of a person who’s gone from an old-style, dial-up modem to high-speed Internet overnight.

“Before, we had to search one gene at a time, going through 20,000 genes,” says Kenneth W. Kinzler about the hunt for cancer genes. “More than two decades of research can now be repeated in a week,” adds Kinzler, an oncologist who runs a lab focused on the genetics of cancer at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. It is now possible to quickly reveal the code for every gene inside a tumor in a couple of weeks and compare that tumor’s genes to the genetic instructions of normal tissue. All for just a few thousand dollars—bargain prices, as genomes go.

Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the General Discussions CURE discussion group.
Special Feature
Share Your Art
Related Articles
Talking With Our Eyes: Communicating After a Cancer Diagnosis
Finalist for the 2015 Extraordinary Healer Award for Oncology Nursing: Beverly M. Moser, RN, BSN, OCN [Rose Quarter Compass Oncology in Portland, Oregon]
Recommendations When Considering a Second Opinion
In this segment, Freda Omaswa discusses how her medical background has played a role in her decisions about the treatment and management of her disease. She, and, Dr G. Emmett Lynskey, explain how levels of physician expertise in certain fields can play a role in patients' decisions to seek opinions from additional healthcare professionals.After a 19-month battle with metastatic colon carcinoma, Freda passed away quietly in her sleep on February 1, 2016.
Empowering Patients: Considerations of Healthcare Professionals
Dr John Marshall emphasizes why it is important for patients to research their disease following a diagnosis and discusses some of the common conflicts he faces when delivering news to patients and their loved ones.
Related Videos
Diagnosing and Treating Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
C. Ola Landgren provides an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of smoldering multiple myeloma.
Amanda L. Kong on Seeking a Second Opinion for Breast Cancer Care at a High Volume Hospital
Amanda L. Kong, discusses why patients should consider seeking a second opinion for their breast cancer diagnosis and care at a high volume hospital.
Amanda L. Kong on Breast Cancer Care at High Volume Hospitals
This study sought to identify patterns of breast cancer care at high volume hospitals.