Blenrep Improves Durability in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma


Blenrep improves durability and provides meaningful response rates to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, researchers found.

image of myeloma

The treatment of Blenrep (belantamabmafodotin) alone improves durability and offers meaningful response rates to the drug in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), according to the results of a recent study. 

Patients with RRMM who have received three prior therapies for the diseasehave quicker response rates when treated with Blenrep alone, as presented in a study from the journal, Cancer. However, the study stated that RRMM has a poor prognosis (outcome of a disease) and limited treatment options for patients.

Blenrep is a considered a B-cell maturation antigen-binding antibody-drug conjugate, which is a drug that directly kills off myeloma cells and activates anti-myeloma immune responses, as reported in the study.

This drug is used to treat RRMM, a type of cancer in plasma cells within bone marrow, according to American Cancer Society. The term relapsed refers to the return of a disease or signs and symptoms after a period of improvement and the term refractory is defined as a disease that does not respond to treatment, established by National Cancer Institute.

In the Cancer study, a total of 201 patients within the trial, DREAMM-2, analyzed the efficacy and durability of Blenrep in patients with RRMM. Patient-participants were placed into three different groups, in which 97 patients were in the Blenrep 2.5 mg/kg cohort, 99 patients were in the Blenrep3.4 mg/kg cohort and 25 patients were placed into the Blenreplyophilized (freeze-dried) 3.4 mg/kg cohort. These cohorts were created based on the dose and form of the treatment (lyophilized versus non-lyophilized).

The primary endpoint in the study (the main result that measures a treatment’s efficacy), was overall response rate (ORR), which is defined as the percentage of a treatment group who have a partial or complete response to treatment within a given period, according to National Cancer Institute. The study authors found the in the Blenrep 2.5 mg/kg cohort, the ORR was 32%and in the Blenrep 3.4 mg/kg cohort was 35%. The Blenrep lyophilized 3.4 mg/kg cohort had an ORR of 52%.

The secondary endpoint in the study included the median progression-free survival (PFS; the period during and after treatment of cancer when the disease does not worsen) and overall survival (OS; the period from diagnosis or treatment where patients are still alive). The study authors reported that the median PFS was 2.5 months for patients in the Blenrep 2.5 mg/kg cohort, 2.8 months for patients in the 3.4 mg/kg cohort and 5.7 months for patients in the Blenrep lyophilized 3.4 mg/kg cohort.

“Despite having similar ORR and PFS,” the study authors wrote, “the shorterDoR(duration of response; period from the beginning of treatment to when patients have a complete or partial response to treatment) reported here for the 3.4 mg/kg cohort may be due to tolerability issues requiring more frequent dose modifications.”

The median OS for patient-participants in the study was 15.3 months in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort. The 3.4 mg/kg and lyophilized 3.4 mg/kg cohorts had median OS of 14 and 24.5 months, respectively.

In terms of safety, the authors reported that 98% of patients in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort experienced at least one or more side effects and 88% of the patients within this cohort experienced treatment-related side effects. Similarly, 100% of the patients in the 3.4 mg/kg cohort experienced at least one or more side effects and 95% of these patients experienced treatment-related side effects. In the lyophilized 3.4 mg/kg cohort, 100% of patients also experienced at least one or more side effects.

“The grade of (side effects) remained unchanged with longer follow-up. Keratopathy (degeneration of the cornea in the eye) was the most common (side effect) overall and was mostly grade 1 to 2, with 29% of patients having grade 3 and no patients having grade 4 keratopathy in the 2.5 mg/kg cohort,”the authors wrote in the study. “Incidents of thrombocytopenia (low platelet count in the blood) and other (blood-related side effects) were consistent with the previous reports and did not increase over time.”

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Related Videos
Dr. Mikhael in an interview with CURE
Dr. Ajai Chari in an in interview with CURE
An image of Dr. Patel in an interview with CURE discussing healthy lifestyles in myeloma
Dr. Munshi in an interview with CURE
Dr. Dikran Kazandjian during an interview with CURE
Related Content