• Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
  • Melanoma
  • Bladder Cancer
  • Brain Cancer
  • Breast Cancer
  • Childhood Cancers
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Gynecologic Cancer
  • Head & Neck Cancer
  • Immunotherapy
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Leukemia
  • Liver Cancer
  • Lung Cancer
  • Lymphoma Cancer
  • Mesothelioma
  • MPN
  • MDS
  • Myeloma
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Rare Cancers
  • Sarcoma
  • Skin Cancer
  • Testicular Cancer
  • Thyroid Cancer

Senaparib Improves Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

News
Article

The phase 3 FLAMES trial showed a benefit of progression-free survival with senaparib compared to placebo in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer.

senaparib shows improvements for PFS in ovarian cancer

Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer — regardless of their BRCA mutation status — tended to experience a reduction in the risk of progression or death with senaparib (IMP4297) maintenance therapy compared with placebo.

Results from the phase 3 FLAMES trial, which were presented at the 2023 European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress showed that the median progression-free survival (PFS; time from treatment until disease worsens or death) criteria was not reached in the senaparib arm compared with 13.6 months in the placebo arm, yielding a 57% risk reduction in progression or death with senaparib. At 12 months, the PFS rate in the senaparib arm was 72.2% vs 53.7%, and at 24 months it was 63.0% vs 31.3%.

“The results support senaparib as a maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line chemotherapy,” Dr. Xiaohua Wu, professor in the Department of Gynecology at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, said during the presentation.

A total of 393 patients were enrolled and randomly to either the senaparib group (262 patients) at 100 mg each day or the matched placebo group (131 patients). Patients continued treatment for up to two years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The preplanned interim analysis data cutoff date was March 16, 2023, and the median follow-up was 22.3 months.

The primary end point was PFS by blinded independent review, with key secondary end points being PFS by investigator assessment, safety and time from randomization to discontinuation or death.

Baseline characteristics between the senaparib (271 patients) and placebo (133 patients) groups in the intent-to-treat population included a median age of 55 vs 54. Additionally, a majority had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG); which determines ability of patient to tolerate therapies in serious illness performance status of 1, serous histology and a negative BRCA mutation status (65.3 vs 66.9%).


Additional patient characteristics included most having absent gross residual disease after debulking surgery in the senaparib (77.6%) and placebo groups (72.7%), a complete response to platinum-based treatment (87.5% vs 89.5%) and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (50.6% vs 51.9%). The median cycles of platinum-based treatment were 7 in both arms.

Treatment discontinuation occurred in 72.7% of patients in the senaparib arm vs 87.2% in the placebo group. Reasons for discontinuation included disease progression (30.6% vs 60.9%), completing two years of treatment (25.1% vs 16.5%), patient or investigator decision (12.5% vs 9.8%) or side effects (4.4% vs 0.0%) between both groups, respectively.

At the data cutoff, 27.3% of patients in the senaparib arm and 12.8% in the placebo arm were still receiving treatment. In the senaparib arm, the median duration of study treatment was 18.7 months vs 11.4 months in the placebo arm.

For patients who were BRCA mutation-positive, the median PFS was not evaluable in the senaparib arm vs 15.6 months in the placebo arm. For those with BRCA-negative disease, the median PFS was not evaluable in the senaparib arm and 12.9 months in the placebo arm.

All secondary end points showed the superiority of senaparib. The end points included median PFS by investigator assessment, median time from randomization to discontinuation or death, chemotherapy-free interval and median time from randomization to first subsequent therapy or death.

Side effects of grade 3 or higher occurred in 66.3% of patients in the senaparib arm vs 20.3% in the placebo arm, with treatment-emergent side effects being reported in 99.6% vs 97.7%, and serious side effects in 27.8% vs 3.8%. As a result of treatment-emergent side effects, dose interruptions occurred in 76.7% vs 19.5%, dose reductions in 63.3% vs 6.0%, and discontinuation in 4.4% vs 0.0% in the senaparib and placebo arms, respectively.

In the senaparib arm, the most common treatment-emergent side effects of grade 3 or higher were anemia (29 patients), thrombocytopenia (27 patients), and neutropenia (25 patients). In the placebo arm, the most common were hypertriglyceridemia (4 patients); weight increase (3 patients); and neutropenia, leukopenia and abdominal pain occurring in 2 patients each

“Senaparib demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with a very low incidence of permanent discontinuation and no significant safety concerns observed,” Wu concluded.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Related Videos
Woman with dark brown hair and pink lipstick wearing a light pink blouse with a light brown blazer. Patients should have conversations with their providers about treatments after receiving diagnoses.
Man in a navy suit with a purple tie. Dr. Saby George talks to CURE about how treatment with Opdivo could mitigate disparities in patients with kidney cancer.
Dr. Kim in an interview with CURE
Dr. Barzi in an interview with CURE
Related Content