Article

Sorting out the low-risk cancers

Author(s):

Debu Tripathy blog image

There is so much attention on the aggressiveness and dangers of cancer – and rightly so, as it is a major cause of death in our society. However, there is a flip side to this story – a diverse group of low-risk cancers, or "precancers" that could in some cases even be better left undiagnosed, as the treatment may actually cause more harm than good. These types of malignancies include diagnoses like "in situ" or "non-invasive" cancers that are commonly seen in the breast, prostate and cervix, or "borderline ovarian tumors." In many cases, they do not have the potential to invade other tissue or to spread, so they don't carry the same risks of illness and death. Some have even advocated that we rename these diseases without using the words "carcinoma" or "cancer," which bring out fear and anxiety and also motivate patients, as well as clinicians, to carry out more aggressive treatments. However, these low-risk cancers can sometimes co-exist with more dangerous invasive (or infiltrating) cancers, and as they are typically treated with surgical removal, there can still be recurrences over the course of time, which can be either in situ or invasive. They rarely can result in death. However, these bad outcomes are unusual enough that when one looks at large population statistics for many of the in situ types of cancer, survival rates are indistinguishable from the normal population. So, what are medical experts and even some patient advocates now saying? The messages are mixed as there is controversy that balances the small risks of these cancers against side effects of diagnosis and treatment. For one, there are calls for modifying our cancer screening procedures – this is particularly true for breast and prostate cancer, where "overtreatment" of harmless cancers carry significant short- and long-term side effects. We also need to develop better imaging and tissue-based tests to identify the rare aggressive cancer hiding among a sea of low-risk cases. Finally, we need to make sure that physicians and the public are up to date on the latest recommendations and developments in this area, as it will continue to evolve.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on cancer updates, research and education

Related Videos
Daniel Jernazian, who beat cancer twice, credits his sports mindset for survival and calls it winning his ‘life World Championship’.
Patients in rural or underserved areas may have worse outcomes, highlighting the need for early support to address care access barriers.
Image of man with text.
Image of doctor with text.
Dr. Emre Yekedüz discusses how ASCO 2025 highlights precision medicine, biomarkers and the gut microbiome as keys to advancing kidney cancer care.
Dr. Breelyn Wilky stresses the importance of expert guidance and second opinions for patients with GIST, as treatment options continue to evolve rapidly.
Mark Daniels, 83, credits CAR T-cell therapy and compassionate care for helping him overcome lymphoma and endure the isolating treatment toll.
An early study of BGB-16673 for hard-to-treat leukemia found that side effects were manageable with no new safety concerns.
Image of woman with text.
Image of goy, and text.
Related Content