When it comes to survival rates for second cancers, younger patients had poorer outcomes than their older counterparts, according to a recent study.
Second primary cancers in pediatric and adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients are deadlier than they are in older patients, according to a new study published in JAMA Oncology.
Researchers from University of California, Davis (UC Davis), Oregon Health and Science University in Portland and the John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, California, examined five-year survival rates and found that after a second cancer it was 33.1 percent lower for children, 20.2 percent lower for AYA patients and 8.3 percent lower for older adults compared with a primary cancer at the same age.
They determined their findings by using data from more than a million (15,954 pediatric, 125,750 AYA and 878,370 older adult) patients with cancer of all ages throughout the United States using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program — 13 registries.
One group of patients in the study had only a one cancer, while the other group had a first cancer and then developed a second cancer.
Fourteen of the most common cancer types that affect children and AYAs were examined: female breast, thyroid, testicular, Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, soft tissue sarcoma, bone sarcoma, colorectal, central nervous system, cervical and ovarian cancer.
“We know from prior studies that the risk of developing a second cancer varies by age, with those diagnosed with their first cancer at a young age having a higher risk of a second cancer than those diagnosed with their first cancer later in life,” Theresa Keegan, Ph.D., M.S., associate professor in the division of hematology and oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, said in an interview with CURE. “In this study, we found that the adverse impact of a second cancer on survival was most pronounced in children and AYAs compared with older adults.”
The researchers saw significant differences in survival among the common cancer types. For instance, AYA patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia as a first cancer had a 57 percent chance of surviving for five years, but that dropped to 29 percent if it was the second cancer. For AYA patients diagnosed with breast cancer, the five-year survival was 81 percent for a first cancer, but 63 percent if it was a second cancer.
There are no clear explanations on why survival is worse for children and AYA patients compared with older patients. However, Keegan did offer potential reasons why survival may be worse after a second cancer at any age.
“Worse survival after second cancers may result from the second cancer being more biologically aggressive, those with a second cancer having a worse response to treatment, limitations on types or doses of treatment they can receive as a result of their prior cancer treatment or impaired physiological reserves that impair their ability to impact treatment for their second cancer,” said Keegan.
To get a broader understanding of what this all means, Keegan and the team plan to examine how the time between getting a first and second cancer affects survival and whether the type of treatment for the first cancer influences the outcome of a second cancer.
Keegan added that all cancer survivors have an increased risk of second cancers and, although the reason for this is not clear, there are cancer prevention strategies that patients and survivors can apply.
“In addition to cancer prevention behaviors, it is important for cancer survivors to undergo surveillance and screening for second cancers,” said Keegan. “Making this part of routine survivorship care allows for second cancers to be diagnosed as early as possible.”