
Opinion|Videos|May 5, 2025
Exploring a Patient Case: Biomarker Testing After Progression and Discussing Treatment Choices With Your Care Team
Author(s)Virginia Kaklamani, MD, DSc, Megan Kruse, MD
Panelists discuss how to communicate genomic testing results to patients and make shared treatment decisions, particularly when multiple targeted therapy options are available for patients with ESR1 and PIK3CA mutations.
Advertisement
Episodes in this series

Clinical Brief: EMERALD Trial Insights for ESR1-Mutant Breast Cancer
Main Discussion Topics:
- Overview of EMERALD trial design and patient population
- Co-primary end points and efficacy outcomes for ESR1-mutant tumors
- Critical subset analyses identifying best responders (>12 months prior CDK4/6)
- Median PFS outcomes: 8.6 months versus 3.8 months in optimal patients
- Limited relevance of variant allele frequency (VAF) for treatment selection
Key Points for Physicians:
- Elacestrant approved specifically for ESR1-mutant metastatic breast cancer
- Prior CDK4/6 duration greater than 12 months predicts better response (8.6 versus 1.9 months PFS)
- Benefit maintained across visceral disease, multiple metastatic sites
- PIK3CA co-mutations do not negate elacestrant benefit
- VAF is not currently useful for treatment selection decision-making
The EMERALD trial established that patient selection based on endocrine sensitivity duration, rather than just mutation presence, optimizes treatment outcomes with elacestrant.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on CURE
1
FDA Approves Keytruda and Padcev for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
2
Your Genes, Your Treatment: Biomarker Testing and Lung Cancer
3
Giredestrant Shows Benefit for Early Breast Cancer in Phase 3 Trial
4
Looking Back on a Blood Cancer Diagnosis Nearly 35 Years Later
5



