Keytruda Still Under Review for MSI-H Cancer

The supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for Keytruda (pembrolizumab) is still under review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat MSI-H cancer.
BY Jason M. Broderick
PUBLISHED March 10, 2017
The supplemental biologics license application (sBLA) for Keytruda (pembrolizumab) is still under review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The sBLA would be to use the drug in treating previously-treated patients who have advanced microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancer, according to Merck, the manufacturer of the anti-PD-1 agent.  

Merck announced in November 2016 that Keytruda had received a priority review from the FDA for use in this setting, with a final decision expected under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act by March 8, 2017. The company now reports that it has submitted further data and analyses supporting the pending sBLA, but has not provided an updated timeframe for the regulatory review.

The sBLA for Keytruda is based on results from five open-label, multicohort phase 1/2 trials that evaluated Keytruda in patients with MSI-H tumors. The specific regimen would be a fixed dosed of 200 mg of Keytruda every three weeks.

In November 2015, the FDA granted a breakthrough therapy designation to Keytruda as a potential therapy for patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

The designation was based on findings from an ongoing phase 2 study, which demonstrated high response rates with Keytruda in patients with heavily pretreated CRC with mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, a condition that causes MSI. Findings from the analysis were published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM); however, data that were simultaneously presented at the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting were from a more up-to-date analysis.

In the findings presented at ASCO, the objective response rate (ORR) was 62 percent with Keytruda in MMR-deficient mCRC compared with 0 percent in patients with MMR-proficient tumors. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, with many patients responding to treatment for longer than 12 months in the MMR-deficient arm.

In the three-arm study that was the basis for the new designation, Keytruda was administered at 10 mg/kg every two weeks to patients with CRC who were MMR-deficient (13 patients) and MMR-proficient (25 patients). Additionally, a separate arm looked at Keytruda in patients with MMR-deficient non-CRC malignancies (10 patients). MMR and microsatellite instability testing was conducted using PCR and IHC, which are standard tests conducted for patients with CRC in order to detect Lynch syndrome.

Defects in MMR commonly lead to microsatellite instability, which can be found in most cancers, including a majority of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis CRC (Lynch syndrome). Without this repair mechanism, the mutational burden is generally higher, suggesting a higher likelihood of developing cancer. In total, more than 80 percent of patients in the MMR-deficient arm were positive for Lynch syndrome.

The primary endpoint of the study was immune-related PFS and response rate at 20 weeks. Secondary endpoints focused on OS, PFS, and disease control rate (DCR; complete response, partial response, plus stable disease). Response and survival were assessed by RECIST criteria in addition to immune-related criteria.

In the 48 patients analyzed from the study for the ASCO presentation, those with MMR-deficient CRC experienced a DCR of 92 percent compared with 16 percent in MMR-proficient tumors. After a median treatment duration of 5.9 months, no patients in the MMR-deficient group who responded had progressed. In patients with MMR-deficient non-CRC tumors, the ORR was 60 percent and the DCR was 70 percent.

OS and PFS were not reached in the MMR-deficient group versus a median PFS of 2.3 months and an OS of 7.6 months in the MMR-proficient group.

In the analysis published in NEJM, which contained data from fewer patients, the ORR with Keytruda was 40 percent in patients with MMR-deficient mCRC (10 patients). In this same group, the PFS rate with Keytruda at 20 weeks was 78 percent.

The adverse events (AEs) seen in the study were consistent with other studies of Keytruda. The most common side effects were rash/pruritus (17 percent), pancreatitis (15 percent), and thyroiditis/hypothyroidism (10 percent).

Interestingly, patients with Lynch syndrome (11 patients) were less likely to respond compared with those with other forms of MMR, according to the data published in NEJM. In those with Lynch syndrome, the ORR was 27 percent with Keytruda compared with 100 percent in those with MMR that was unrelated to Lynch syndrome (six patients).

In total, 1,782 somatic mutations were identified per patient in the MMR-deficient arm compared with 73 in those with MMR-proficient tumors. Predominately, these tumors were found to alter amino acids (63 percent) and 578 of the somatic mutations in the deficient arm were associated with the immune system.

Membranous PD-L1 expression was only identified in patients with MMR-deficient tumors. Additionally, tumors with MMR-deficiencies were more likely to contain a greater density of CD8+ lymphoid cells. However, the researchers noted that neither PD-L1 nor CD8 were significantly associated with PFS and OS.

In findings presented in January at the 2016 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, treatment with Keytruda produced an ORR of 47 percent in a phase II trial of patients with noncolorectal GI cancers whose tumors were mismatch repair-deficient.3

The phase 2 study enrolled three patient cohorts. The first two cohorts were patients with CRC, while the third cohort included 21 patients with any solid gastrointestinal tumor that had mismatch repair deficiency. This cohort was subsequently expanded by 50 patients.

Patients were treated with Keytruda at 10 mg/kg every two weeks. Mismatch repair testing was performed locally using standard immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair deficiency or polymerase chain reaction-based testing for microsatellite instability.

To be eligible for the third cohort, patients had to have histologically proven metastatic or locally advanced mismatch repair-deficient non-CRC solid tumor malignancy, measureable and progressive disease, and an ECOG performance score of 0 or 1, and must have received at least one prior therapy.

Data from 17 patients with non-CRC GI cancers deficient in mismatch repair were available for analysis: four patients with ampullary cancer, four with pancreatic cancer, three with biliary cancer, three with small bowel cancer and three with gastric cancer. Their median age was 60 years; 29 percent were female, 29 percent had an ECOG performance score of 0, and 100 percent had metastatic disease. The median number of prior regimens was two.

The rate and type of treatment-related AEs were similar to those in prior Keytruda studies. Seventy-six percent of patients developed treatment-related AEs. Most were low grade; two patients developed short-lived grade 3/4 AEs that did not require steroid therapy. The most common AEs were fatigue (24 percent), thyroid disorders (24 percent), and rash/pruritus (41 percent).

At a median follow-up of 5.3 months, the ORR was 47 percent: 25 percent had a complete response and 24 percent had a partial response. Twenty-nine percent had stable disease, and the disease control rate was 76 percent.

Clinical benefit was observed across tumors with mismatch repair deficiency including cancers of the colon, stomach, duodenum, pancreas, ampulla, and bile ducts.

Responses ranged from four months to 20 months, and all responders were still on treatment at the time of the data presentation. One patient with duodenal cancer developed a brain metastasis at 5.5 months and is still on therapy for longer than 18 months owing to excellent systemic disease control.

Confirmatory studies are currently evaluating Keytruda monotherapy for patients with advanced MSI-H or mismatch repair deficient tumors. The first, the phase 2 KEYNOTE-164 study, is examining the agent in previously treated patients with advanced CRC and the second, the phase 3 KEYNOTE-177, is exploring Keytruda for treatment-naive patients with CRC. A separate phase 2 study, the KEYNOTE-158 trial, is exploring Keytruda for patients with non-CRC MSI-H tumors.

Keytruda has approvals in melanoma, lung cancer, and head and neck cancer. Other applications for approval are pending with the FDA in bladder cancer and Hodgkin lymphoma, as a monotherapy, and in combination with chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer.
 
 
Be the first to discuss this article on CURE's forum. >>
Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the General Discussions CURE discussion group.

Related Articles

1
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!
×

Sign Up

Are you a member? Please Log In