“Particularly noticeable is the fact that in the [triplet] group, those patients with unmutated IGHV [36-month PFS rate, 82.8%] are doing as well as those with mutated IGHV [36-month PFS rate, 83.6%], suggesting that the addition of [Gazyva] may overcome the adverse impact of unmutated IGHV,” Brown explained.
Further, investigators found the highest rate of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) among those who received the regimen with Gazyva. Of the patients who were evaluable at end of therapy, uMRD rates at a sensitivity level 10-4 in the peripheral blood were 45% in the doublet group, 95% in the triplet group and 72.9% in the investigators’ choice group.
The 36-month OS rates with the doublet, triplet, and FCR/BR regimens were 94.1%, 87.7% and 85.9%, respectively. “Of note, the study was conducted at the height of the pandemic, and COVID-19 deaths were seen in 10 patients on the [doublet] group, 25 on the [triplet] group and 21 on the chemoimmunotherapy group,” Brown explained. Therefore, after pre-planned censoring, the adjusted rates were 97.5%, 96.2% and 93.7%, respectively.
The most common grade 3 (severe) or worse side effect (AE) was neutropenia, low white blood cell count, occurring in 26.8% of those who received the AV regimen (291 patients), 35.2% of those given AVO (284 patients) and 32.4% of those given FCR/BR (259 patients). Serious AEs were seen in 24.7%, 38.4% and 27.4% of patients, respectively.
Patients with treatment-naive CLL have a variety of options, such as a fixed-duration regimen of Venclexta and Imbruvica (ibrutinib); however, Brown noted that despite deep and durable responses, cardiac toxicity remains. When evaluating AEs of interest, 9.3% and 12% of patients in the doublet and triplet groups experienced a cardiac event, compared with 3.5% of those in the FCR/BR group; grade 3 or worse cardiac events occurred in 1.7%, 2.5% and 1.2% of patients, respectively. However, rates of grade 3 or worse atrial fibrillation (0.3% versus 0.7% versus 0.8%, respectively) and hypertension (2.7% versus 2.1% versus 0.7%) remained low.
Of note, Brown acknowledged that the study was limited by the control group treatment regimen no longer being considered the SOC, which occurred after the trial began in 2019. “I think when physicians are considering whether to use the two or the three-drug regimen, they have to take account of the patient in front of them,” she concluded.
“Based on these impressive data from the AMPLIFY trial, Calquence is only the second-generation BTK inhibitor to demonstrate efficacy in the front-line treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia as both a treat-to-progression and a fixed-duration approach,” Susan Galbraith, executive vice president, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, stated in a press release on the data. “This advance is an important development for patients and their physicians who seek new options and more flexibility in managing this disease in the long term.”
Reference:
“Fixed-duration Calquence plus Venclexta with or without Gazyva Versus chemoimmunotherapy for first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: interim analysis of the multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 AMPLIFY trial.” By Dr. Jennifer R. Brown, et al., Blood.
For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.