Doctor, What Should I Do?
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
Web Exclusive: Corporations Unite Against Cancer
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Web Exclusive: What Parents Can Do
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Web Exclusive: A Lion in the House
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
Multiple Myeloma & Leukemia
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Coping
September 27, 2006 – Christopher Schultz
Legal Rights as a Survivor
September 27, 2006
Bookshelf
September 27, 2006 – Kathy LaTour
House Call
September 27, 2006 – Aman Buzdar
Mitigating Litigation
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Cancer with a Known Cause
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Cure Becomes Less Risky
September 27, 2006 – Alice McCarthy
Classifying & Clarifying MDS
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
When the Choice Is Not Cure
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
The Scoring System
September 27, 2006
Do Women Under 50 Need Mammograms?
September 27, 2006 – Beverly A. Caley
Watch It or Treat It?
September 27, 2006 – Beverly A. Caley
Sisterhood
September 27, 2006 – Jo Cavallo
Creating a Dragon Boat Team
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Arms in Motion
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Job-Searching Hints for Survivors
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Working Through Caregiver Grief
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Fatal Fibers
September 27, 2006 – Katy Human
People & Places
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Back in Action After DCIS
September 27, 2006 – Nancy Reuben Greenfield
Getting the Care You Deserve
September 27, 2006 – Stacy Beller Stryer
Treatment Boost for MDS
September 27, 2006 – Alice McCarthy
Power to the Patient
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
In Situ Breast Cancer: Is It Really Cancer?
September 27, 2006 – Beverly A. Caley
The Shadow Survivors
September 27, 2006 – Jo Cavallo
Taming the Dragon
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
The Choice to Work
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
A Waste of Taste
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
A Cunning Predator
September 27, 2006 – Katy Human
Lessons Learned
September 27, 2006 – Cole A. Giller, MD PhD
Letters from Our Readers
September 27, 2006
A Worry-Free Way to Support Nonprofits?
September 27, 2006 – Emma Johnson
Message from the Editor
September 27, 2006
Doctor, What Should I Do?
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
Web Exclusive: Corporations Unite Against Cancer
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Web Exclusive: What Parents Can Do
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Web Exclusive: A Lion in the House
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
Multiple Myeloma & Leukemia
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Coping
September 27, 2006 – Christopher Schultz
Legal Rights as a Survivor
September 27, 2006
Bookshelf
September 27, 2006 – Kathy LaTour
House Call
September 27, 2006 – Aman Buzdar
Mitigating Litigation
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Cancer with a Known Cause
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Cure Becomes Less Risky
September 27, 2006 – Alice McCarthy
Currently Viewing
Classifying & Clarifying MDS
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
The Scoring System
September 27, 2006
Do Women Under 50 Need Mammograms?
September 27, 2006 – Beverly A. Caley
Watch It or Treat It?
September 27, 2006 – Beverly A. Caley
Sisterhood
September 27, 2006 – Jo Cavallo
Creating a Dragon Boat Team
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Arms in Motion
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Job-Searching Hints for Survivors
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Working Through Caregiver Grief
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Fatal Fibers
September 27, 2006 – Katy Human
People & Places
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
Back in Action After DCIS
September 27, 2006 – Nancy Reuben Greenfield
Getting the Care You Deserve
September 27, 2006 – Stacy Beller Stryer
Treatment Boost for MDS
September 27, 2006 – Alice McCarthy
Power to the Patient
September 27, 2006 – Marc Silver
In Situ Breast Cancer: Is It Really Cancer?
September 27, 2006 – Beverly A. Caley
The Shadow Survivors
September 27, 2006 – Jo Cavallo
Taming the Dragon
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
The Choice to Work
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
A Waste of Taste
September 27, 2006 – Elizabeth Whittington
A Cunning Predator
September 27, 2006 – Katy Human
Lessons Learned
September 27, 2006 – Cole A. Giller, MD PhD
Letters from Our Readers
September 27, 2006
A Worry-Free Way to Support Nonprofits?
September 27, 2006 – Emma Johnson
Message from the Editor
September 27, 2006

Classifying & Clarifying MDS

Improvements in the classification of myelodysplastic syndrome, MDS, based on varying characteristics in the disease have better defined prognosis and helped patients and doctors make treatment-related decisions.

BY Elizabeth Whittington
PUBLISHED September 27, 2006

As scientists learned more about MDS, they found varying characteristics in the disease, including appearance, prognosis and the likelihood of developing into acute myeloid leukemia. First separated into categories by the French-American-British Cooperative Group, the World Health Organization modified the FAB classifications in 1999. The improvements better defined prognosis and helped patients and doctors make treatment-related decisions. 

The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) assesses the overall risks associated with the disease and its progression. IPSS uses chromosomal information, the percentage of abnormal early blood cells in the bone marrow (called blast cells) and blood cell deficiencies outside the bone marrow to develop the score. Several groups are now working on modifications of that system as well, such as incorporating whether a patient becomes transfusion-dependent.

Unfortunately, there is continued debate over where the line is drawn between MDS and acute myeloid leukemia and whether such a precise distinction needs to be made. One of the changes the WHO implemented in categorizing MDS included lowering the percentage of blast cells to indicate AML from 30 to 20 percent, but some experts recommend also taking into account other factors, such as age, comorbidities, chromosomal abnormalities and overall health.

The following types are described in the WHO classifications based on blast percentage, cell appearance and affected blood cells. As the blast cell percentage increases, the risk of AML also increases.

1. When blast cells comprise less than 5 percent of red blood cells in the bone marrow, a patient is diagnosed with classic refractory anemia. It has a good prognosis, and only 6 percent of these patients develop AML.

2. Patients with refractory anemia who have ring-shaped iron deposits in more than 15 percent of their blast cells are diagnosed as having refractory anemia with ringed sidero-blasts. These deposits form because the cells aren’t able to use iron properly. It carries a low risk of developing AML (1 to 2 percent).

3. The most common type, refractory anemia with excess blasts, is separated into two types. The percentage of blast cells defines the disease as type 1 (less than 10 percent blasts) or type 2 (10 percent blasts or higher). Refractory anemia with excess blasts can affect up to 20 percent of all blood cells in the bone marrow. This type comprises about 40 percent of all MDS cases, and evolves into AML in about 25 percent (type 1) to 33 percent (type 2) of cases.

4. A quarter of MDS patients have refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, which is characterized by having less than 5 percent blasts. Occasionally more than one blast cell will form, leading to multiple abnormal cell lines. In contrast to anemia, patients with cytopenia will have low blood counts for at least two types of blood cells. Ten percent of patients with this type will develop leukemia. Patients with refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia and ringed sideroblasts have a similar prognosis.

5. Refractory anemia patients with a section of chromosome 5 missing have 5q deletion MDS, which has a good prognosis and rarely develops into leukemia. Revlimid is especially effective for this MDS type and has been approved only for use in this subgroup of patients.

6. Formerly called chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the FAB classification, the inclusion of MDS/myeloproliferative disorder in the WHO classification is controversial because it mostly affects white bloods cells. It has a few similarities to chronic myelogenous leukemia, but does not have the identifying Philadelphia chromosome.

Continue the conversation on CURE’s forum. >>
Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the CURE discussion group.

Related Articles

1
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!
×

Sign Up

Are you a member? Please Log In