Notably, grade 3 or 4 TRAEs with potential immunologic etiology occurred in no more than 7% of Chinese patients in the Opdivo plus chemotherapy group across organ categories; no grade 5 (death) events occurred in either group.
In the overall population, the ORR was 66% in the Opdivo group versus 45% in the chemotherapy alone group. In the experimental group, the complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) rates were 17%, 49%, 25% and 9%, respectively. These respective rates were 8%, 37%, 30% and 14% in the control group.
The median duration of response (DOR) in the overall population was 12.5 months for the Opdivo group versus 5.6 months for the chemotherapy alone group.
In the PD-L1 CPS of at least 5 population, the ORR was 68% in the Opdivo group versus 48% in the chemotherapy alone group. The respective CR, PR, SD and PD in the Opdivo group were 19%, 49%, 23% and 9%. These respective rates were 11%, 37%, 25% and 17% in the control group. The median DOR in this population was 12.5 months and 6.9 months for the experimental and control groups, respectively.
The OS, PFS and ORR benefits with the Opdivo regimen were consistent across different PD-L1 CPS subgroups.
Among all randomly assigned patients in the experimental group, patients who responded to Opdivo plus chemotherapy (49 patients) experienced a median OS of 21.5 months compared with nine months for those who had SD or PD (33 patients). In the chemotherapy group, responders (42 patients) achieved a median OS of 14.5 months versus 9.1 months for non-responders (34 patients).
In the population of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 5, those who responded to Opdivo plus chemotherapy (40 patients) had a median OS of 23.3 months versus 11.5 months for those who did not respond to the experimental regimen (23 patients). In the chemotherapy group, the median OS was 13.1 months for responders (33 patients) versus 9.1 months for non-responders (22 patients).
CheckMate 649 Overview
The randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study enrolled patients with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, GEJ cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients were not permitted to have HER2-positive disease, and an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1 was required.
Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 fashion. In the first experimental group, patients received Opdivo at 360 milligrams (mg) in combination with XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) once every three weeks; or Opdivo at 240 mg plus FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fludarabine) once every two weeks. In the control group, patients received chemotherapy alone in the form of XELOX once every three weeks or FOLFOX once every two weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or end of study.
In the Opdivo group, 15% of patients received FOLFOX, and 85% were given XELOX. These rates were 13% and 87%, respectively, in the control group.
The study also included a second experimental group where patients received Opdivo at 1 mg per kilogram (mg/kg) plus Yervoy (ipilimumab) at 3 mg/kg once every three weeks for 4 cycles, followed by Opdivo alone at 240 mg once every two weeks.
Blinded independent central review–assessed PFS and OS in the population of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 5 served as the trial’s dual primary end goal. Secondary end goals included OS and PFS in the overall population, the population of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 1 and the population of patients with a PD-L1 CPS of at least 10; and overall response rate.
For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.
Reference
“First-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO) plus chemotherapy (chemo) versus chemo in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC): 5-year (y) follow-up of Chinese pts from CheckMate 649.” By Dr. Shen L et al. J Clin Oncol. 2025; suppl.392