Currently Viewing
Promising Liver Cancer Treatments on the Horizon
September 28, 2017 – Danielle Bucco
Myeloma Specialists Share Their Treatment Strategies
September 27, 2017 – Christina Loguidice
Expert Gives Updates on Kidney and Bladder Cancer
September 27, 2017 – Gina Columbus
Acupuncture Reduces Symptom Burden in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
September 27, 2017 – Katie Kosko
Survival Rates Increase Faster Than Costs in Myeloma
September 26, 2017 – Brielle Urciuoli
A Whisper and Then a Scream
September 26, 2017 – Shannon Pulaski
Mail-Order Kits Expand Patient Access to Genetic Testing
September 26, 2017 – Brielle Urciuoli
Combinations May Be Crucial for Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer
September 26, 2017 – Danielle Bucco
Keytruda Approved for Some Patients With Gastric Cancer
September 25, 2017 – Jason M. Broderick

Promising Liver Cancer Treatments on the Horizon

After nearly a decade with no new therapies, new drugs to treat liver cancer are showing great promise, according to Steven R. Alberts, M.D.
BY Danielle Bucco
PUBLISHED September 28, 2017
Steven R. Alberts, MD
Steven R. Alberts, M.D.
After nearly a decade with no new therapies, new drugs to treat liver cancer are showing great promise, according to Steven R. Alberts, M.D.

In April 2017, the FDA approved Stivarga (regorafenib), a small-molecule multikinase inhibitor, as a second-line treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had previously received Nexavar.

Just recently, the FDA granted an accelerated approval to Opdivo (nivolumab) for the treatment of patients with HCC following prior Nexavar, regardless of PD-L1 status. The decision is based on results of the phase 1/2 CheckMate-040 trial, in which the checkpoint blockade agent provided durable responses along with a manageable safety profile.

Lenvima (lenvatinib) is another multikinase inhibitor that has the potential to be promising in this landscape. First-line treatment with Lenvima improved progression-free survival by 3.7 months and was noninferior for overall survival compared with Nexavar for patients with unresectable HCC, according to phase 3 results of the REFLECT study. Lenvatinib is not yet FDA-approved in this setting.

In an interview with CURE, Alberts, a professor of oncology in the College of Medicine, consultant in the Division of Medical Oncology at Mayo Clinic, discussed current advancements being made for patients with advanced liver cancer.

What regimens are looking promising for advanced liver cancer?

It is an interesting time in liver cancer. For many years, it was Nexavar and not much else. There were a lot of trials that had been conducted in early phases that showed promising results, but none of those made it to FDA approval until Stivarga. Since then, there have been several drugs heading toward hopefully successful trials.

One of those promising drugs was presented this year at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting with a drug called Lenvima, which is mainly used for thyroid cancer, but, compared with Stivarga, showed comparable outcomes. That is a drug that likely will gain FDA approval.

Is Lenvima being looked at in combination or only as a single agent?

Right now, it is being looked at as a single agent. It has some unique toxicities. Until there is a better understanding of how that drug is working in HCC and what populations of patients might benefit from it, the main focus of it will be single-agent therapy. 

What other ongoing trials are you interested in?

One of the trials right now is with the drug Cabometyx (cabozantinib) that has been ongoing for a while looking at the use of Cabometyx versus placebo. The trial should be near its final accrual with the hope that there may be some results coming out of that in the near future.

Where are we with biomarker research?

Biomarker research continues to be a very active area.  A lot of interest has been focused on markers that could be used for antiangiogenic agents. To date, across most types of cancer, the VEGF receptors, VEGF levels, or other markers of angiogenesis have not worked out as well as we thought.

c-MET inhibition has been of interest, mainly because of Cabometyx, and had been of interest with another drug that was a c-MET inhibitor but, unfortunately, did not move forward. 

What are the most prominent challenges that you would like to see addressed?

As an oncologist, we’re always interested in what is the best possible drug for somebody with advanced disease. When you think about a lot of cancers, and HCC certainly one of those, a good portion of the cancers are preventable, with better treatments for viral hepatitis, whether it is the vaccination for hepatitis B or some newer treatment for hepatitis C that has been making impact.

Unfortunately, looming on the horizon right now is nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [fatty liver]. That is leading to liver disease, which is rapidly increasing in the United States, and will become a dominant cause of HCC in the future.

It is an area that would be nice to see a focus on from the public health standpoint to try to prevent cancers rather than focus on newer treatments. 

What are your main takeaways?

My main hope is that as we’re moving in to a new era of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. We really are starting to see breakthroughs in multiple cancers. HCC is finally one of those areas where we are seeing some new drugs coming forward that show benefit for our patients who had previously had a very limited number of treatment options.
Be the first to discuss this article on CURE's forum. >>
Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the Liver Cancer CURE discussion group.

Related Articles


Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!

Sign Up

Are you a member? Please Log In