News

Article

COCOON Regimen Eases Dermatologic Side Effects After Treatment in EGFR+ NSCLC

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • The COCOON regimen significantly reduced dermatologic side effects and improved quality of life in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients treated with amivantamab and lazertinib.
  • Patients receiving COCOON DM reported lower Skindex-16 scores, indicating better functioning, emotional well-being, and fewer symptoms compared to standard care.
SHOW MORE

The COCOON dermatologic management regimen reduced the quality-of-life impact of Rybrevant/Lazcluze vs SOC treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

The COCOON dermatologic management regimen reduced QOL  impact of Rybrevant/Lazcluze vs SOC in EGFR-mutated NSCLC: © stock.adobe.com.

The COCOON dermatologic management regimen reduced QOL impact of Rybrevant/Lazcluze vs SOC in EGFR-mutated NSCLC: © stock.adobe.com.

The COCOON dermatologic management regimen significantly reduced the quality-of-life impact associated with Rybrevant (amivantamab-vmjw) plus Lazcluze (lazertinib) treatment versus the standard-of-care dermatologic management approach in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to phase 2 findings from the COCOON trial, which were shared at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting

A lower average Skindex-16 total score was reported in patients who received COCOON DM versus those with standard-of-care dermatologic management at day 15 of cycle three. Additionally, use of COCOON DM correlated with improvements in the functioning, emotional and symptoms subscales.

No moderate or severe symptoms on the Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) scale occurred among patients who received COCOON DM at day 15 of cycle three. The rates of patients reporting no symptoms in the COCOON DM and standard-of-care dermatologic management arms, respectively, were 21% versus 7% for rash, 23% versus 7% for skin conditions and 27% versus 16% for nail infections.

“At this analysis, which evaluated the first 12 weeks of treatment, [patients] in the COCOON DM arm experienced lower severity of dermatologic symptoms and a reduced impact on quality of life than [patients] in the standard-of-care dermatologic management arm,” lead study author Jill Feldman, founder of EGFR Registers, a patient advocacy group in Deerfield, Illinois, wrote with coauthors. “Substantial and consistent separation favoring COCCON DM was observed in all postbaseline Skindex-16 subscales. Most [patients] in the COCOON DM arm reported mild or no dermatologic symptoms. This benefit was consistently observed across the first [approximately] 10 weeks of treatment.”

Investigators of the phase 2 COCOON trial prospectively assessed a novel DM regimen for preventing moderate to severe EGFR-associated side effects that may occur following treatment with amivantamab plus lazertinib. In this analysis, investigators highlighted patient-reported outcomes from the first 12 weeks of therapy.

A total of 201 patients were randomly assigned to receive amivantamab/lazertinib plus COCOON DM (99 patients) or standard-of-care dermatologic management (102 patients). The COCOON regimen consisted of oral doxycycline or minocycline for 12 weeks followed by topical clindamycin lotion each day on the scalp, starting at week 13 for nine months; chlorhexidine on the nails each day for 12 months; and ceramide-based moisturizer applied to the body and face at least each day for 12 months. In the standard-of-care dermatologic management arm, patients received general skin prophylaxis based on local practice and relative treatment, including corticosteroids and systemic antibiotics.

The study’s primary end point was the incidence of grade 2 or higher dermatologic side effects within the first 12 weeks following the beginning of amivantamab/lazertinib therapy. The select secondary end points were PROs per Skindex-16 and PGI-S after 12 weeks of follow-up.

The Skindex-16 questionnaire was validated to determine how skin conditions impact quality of life based on the subscales of functioning, emotional, and symptoms. The PGI-S was a patient-reported 4-point rating scale — none, mild, moderate, or severe symptoms — used to evaluate the severity of rashes, skin conditions, and nail infections over time.

Those with locally advanced or metastatic, treatment-naïve NSCLC harboring documented EGFR exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations were eligible for enrollment on the study. An ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 was an additional requirement for study entry.

The investigators noted that the FDA approved amivantamab/lazertinib for patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC based on findings from the phase 3 MARIPOSA trial.

Reference

Feldman J, et al. “Dermatologic prophylaxis and impact on patient-reported outcomes in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with amivantamab plus lazertinib: Results from the phase 2 COCOON trial.” J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(suppl 16):8641. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.8641

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on cancer updates, research and education

Related Videos
Dr. Massimo Cristofanilli discusses the early use of camizestrant with a CDK4/6 inhibitor to target ESR1 mutations, as it may improve outcomes in metastatic breast cancer.
Image of woman.
Image of man.
Image of man.
Image of doctor.
Image of Dr. Boffa.
Most patients in accredited hospitals had smoking discussions documented, showing key care opportunities and smoking’s impact on treatment outcomes.
Image of Dr. Reznick
There are a number of reasons why patients with cancer are encouraged to enroll in clinical trials, Dr. Michael J. Pishvaian explained.
Image of smiling doctor.