Durvalumab Continues to Progress in Treatment of Advanced Bladder Cancer

The FDA's breakthrough designation is meant to expedite the development of therapies that offer substantial benefits over existing options.
BY Silas Inman
PUBLISHED April 01, 2016
In February, the FDA granted a breakthrough therapy designation to durvalumab (MEDI4736) as a treatment for patients with PD-L1–positive inoperable or metastatic urothelial bladder cancer following progression on prior treatment with a platinum-based regimen, according to AstraZeneca, the developer of the PD-L1 inhibitor.

The breakthrough designation, which is meant to expedite the development of therapies that offer substantial benefits over existing options, was based on early findings from a phase 1 study that explored the immunotherapy across several solid tumors. Findings from the urothelial bladder cancer arm of the large trial have not yet been released; however, data from the study were submitted for presentation at a future medical meeting, according to AstraZeneca.

The phase 3 DANUBE study, which launched in July 2015, is currently comparing frontline durvalumab monotherapy against durvalumab plus the CTLA-4 inhibitor tremelimumab or standard of care chemotherapy for patients with metastatic bladder cancer. The primary endpoint of the study, which hopes to enroll 525 participants, is progression-free survival. The estimated primary completion date is November 2017 (NCT02516241).

“Metastatic bladder cancer is an area of enormous unmet medical need. We are encouraged by this breakthrough therapy designation,” Robert Iannone, senior vice president, Head of Immuno-Oncology, Global Medicines Development at AstraZeneca, said in a statement. “We look forward to working closely with the FDA to bring durvalumab to bladder cancer patients as soon as possible.”

The study that was the basis for the designation, known as Study 1108, was among the first to assess durvalumab in humans. The trial began with a dose escalation phase followed by an expansion cohort, which spanned across multiple advanced solid tumors, including non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and bladder cancer.

Across the course of the study, which was initiated in September 2012, the PD-L1 inhibitor was administered intravenously every two, three or four weeks. In a dose expansion cohort that included at least 16 types of cancer, durvalumab is being administered at 10 mg/kg every 14, 21 or 28 days.

The dual primary endpoints of the study were to assess dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and antitumor activity. Secondary endpoints focused on objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS).

In findings from the NSCLC cohort of Study 1108 (200 patients),1 the ORR across the full population was 16 percent with a disease control rate of 42 percent at 12 weeks. In patients with PD-L1–positive disease (84 patients), the ORR was 27 percent. In those identified as negative for the biomarker (92 patients), the response rate was 5 percent. Those with no staining were not evaluable. Preliminary data from the study suggested that patients with PD-L1–positive tumors experienced improvements in OS with durvalumab compared with the negative group. In these early data, the median OS in the negative arm was 8.9 months and was not yet reached in the positive group.

Half of patients treated with durvalumab experienced an AE of any grade. Overall, 8 percent of patients experienced a grade 3/4 AE, 5 percent of which led to discontinuation. There were no reported cases of drug-related colitis and no grade 3/4 drug-related pneumonitis. The most common all-grade AEs were rash (8 percent), diarrhea (7 percent), pruritus (4 percent), hyperthyroidism (4 percent) and hypothyroidism (4 percent).
 
There are currently seven phase 3 studies looking at durvalumab in settings that range from adjuvant therapy to the third-line setting for patients with NSCLC. These studies are assessing the medication as a monotherapy and in combination with tremelimumab or the EGFR T790M-targeted therapy Tagrisso (osimertinib).

In addition to bladder cancer and NSCLC, there are currently two phase 3 studies being prepared for patients with SCCHN. In these studies, durvalumab is being explored as a monotherapy and with tremelimumab. Additionally, a phase 2 study is looking at the medication as a second-line therapy in PD-L1–negative patients with SCCHN.

In data from the SCCHN expansion cohort of Study 1108 (62 patients),2 the ORR for durvalumab at 10 mg/kg every two weeks was 11 percent across the full population. In the PD-L1–positive group (22 patients), the ORR was 18 percent compared with 8 percent in the biomarker negative arm (37 patients). At this analysis, a majority of the responses were ongoing.

In this cohort, 61 percent of patients experienced a drug-related AE, 10 percent of which were grade 3/4. There were no treatment-related incidences of colitis or grade 3/4 pneumonitis. All-grade diarrhea occurred in 8 percent of patients, followed by rash, maculopapular rash and pruritus in 7 percent each.

Early reports from the phase 3 ATLANTIC trial have corroborated the clinical efficacy seen in Study 1108 to some degree. The ATLANTIC trial assessed durvalumab in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic PD-L1–positive NSCLC.

Despite signs of activity and tolerability, however, the company noted that the study was unlikely to support a regulatory filing for the medication as a single-agent. At this time, AstraZeneca has not yet released findings from the study. Results from ATLANTIC are being prepared for presentation at an upcoming medical meeting.

“As we have seen in other studies, durvalumab has demonstrated expected clinical activity and durable response in these heavily pretreated patients,” Sean Bohen, executive vice president, Global Medicines Development and chief medical officer at AstraZeneca, said in a statement. “We now believe it is unlikely that ATLANTIC can be used for regulatory submission as a monotherapy, but we will make that determination following a full analysis of the data.”

References:

  1. Rizvi NA, Brahmer JR, Ou S-HI, et al. Safety and clinical activity of MEDI4736, an anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33 (suppl; abstr 8032).
  2. Segal NH, Ou S-HI, Balmanoukian AS, et al. Safety and efficacy of MEDI4736, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in patients from a squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) expansion cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33 (suppl; abstr 3011).
Be the first to discuss this article on CURE's forum. >>
Talk about this article with other patients, caregivers, and advocates in the Bladder Cancer CURE discussion group.

Related Articles

1
×

Sign In

Not a member? Sign up now!
×

Sign Up

Are you a member? Please Log In